Masamichi Imamura vs Zhengyu Sun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Mar at 07:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Imamura vs Z. Sun

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Imamura 1 - 0 Sun
They have played 3 sets in total, with Masamichi Imamura winning 2 and Zhengyu Sun winning 1. The last match between Masamichi Imamura and Zhengyu Sun was at the M25 Luan, 12-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 2-6 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Imamura | 1 |
| Sun | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Luan(03-12-25)
M. Imamura vs Z. Sun H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.64% (166-122) | Career Total W/L | 35.42% (17-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Imamura vs Z. Sun Match Preview:
When assessing the recent performance of both players, Imamura has shown a stronger capability on second serve, having won 47.64% of points compared to Sun's 38.46% over the last six months. This second serve performance significantly correlates with match prediction accuracy.
Looking at return game statistics, Imamura has dominated by winning 43.65% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Sun has a lower effectiveness, winning none at 0%. For first serve returns, Sun has an edge with a win rate of 30.77% compared to Imamura’s 26.64%. Yet, when predicting the favored player for their head-to-head matchup, these numbers play a crucial role.
Under pressure, Sun displays a strong breakpoint-saving ability with a 71.43% success rate, outperforming Imamura's 58.05%. Such a statistic is vital for in-game betting predictions, signaling Sun's resilience under pressure. Overall, during the past year, Imamura has been more successful, winning 63.86% of matches (W/L 53/30), while Sun has achieved a 36.84% win rate (W/L 7/12).
On favorable surfaces, both players perform best on indoor hard courts. Imamura holds a win rate of 67% (W/L 6/3) on this surface, whereas Sun records a 50% winning percentage (W/L 1/1). Conversely, Imamura struggles on clay with a 50% win rate, while Sun’s weakness appears on hard courts with just a 35% win rate (W/L 9/17).
Analyzing the level at which each player competes, Imamura consistently plays in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.69% of those matches (W/L 41/17), while Sun also predominantly competes at this level but with a lower success rate of 36.84% (W/L 7/12). The level of competition they face is pivotal in determining their relative standings.
Regarding opponent quality, Imamura’s opponents have had an average rank of 434.95, reflecting a slightly less challenging slate, compared to Sun's tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 150.79. In terms of deciding sets, Imamura has managed a 52% success rate in the last 12 months, eclipsing Sun's 33% from all tour matches.
Break point conversion remains a telling statistic. Imamura has been able to convert 36.92% of breakpoint chances, whereas Sun has been unable to capitalize on similar opportunities, recording a 0% conversion rate. Understanding these dynamics can offer insights for live betting or match outcome predictions.
Considering each facet of their performance, Imamura appears to have an advantage across the board. Given these comprehensive statistics, Imamura is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match against Sun.
Masamichi Imamura vs Zhengyu Sun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Imamura vs Z. Sun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:44:34 | Average Match Time | 1:44:34 |
| 71% (54/76) | 1st Serve % | 50% (33/66) |
| 50% (27/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 68% (15/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 88% (7/8) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 53% (35/66) | Return Points Win % | 45% (34/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Imamura Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
QF | L | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Z. Sun Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 1-1 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-5 4-4 ret. | ||

M. Imamura vs Z. Sun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.64% (166/122) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.42% (17/31) |
| 57.23% (368/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.81% (41/62) |
| 53.27% (3195/2803) | Games Win/Loss | 44.35% (420/527) |
| 58.24% (152/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (14/28) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 450 | Aces Total | 53 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 320 | Total Double Faults | 66 |
| 1:11:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 458.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.56 |
| 65% (9049/13853) | 1st Serve % | 51% (584/1135) |
| 66% (5929/9049) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (385/584) |
| 50% (2387/4804) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (251/551) |
| 45% (675/1507) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (42/112) |
| 42% (5931/14281) | Return Points Win % | 39% (424/1100) |
| 41.94% (26/36) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.95% (140/86) | Futures W/L | 35.42% (17/31) |
| 58% (165/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (31/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 46% (31/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 89% (171/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (17/14) |
| 11% (171/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) |
| 12% (117/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (31/2) |